Standard Language Ideology and Discriminatory †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Standard Language Ideology and Discriminatory. Answer: Introduction Primarily, language discrimination is based on accent, vocabulary and syntax. Undoubtedly, any form of discrimination is not good for the people treated differently. Noteworthy, the existence of the United States of America Civil Rights Act of 1964, is sufficient proof of the existence of various forms of discrimination to which the Act seeks to redress(Lippi-Green.2015).Specifically, the Act prohibits workplace discrimination based on the language traits of the employee based on the fact that a potential customer or employer find the worker's language trait not appealing thus asserting to the fact that discrimination based on a person accent is real as it gets. In addition, the United States government implemented a complain mechanism for the victims. This further alludes to the reality of the existence of accent based discrimination. Also, the fact that there are several tried cases reported since the year 1972 shows that there are victims of language-based discrimination. However, not all cases of language-based discrimination are reported due to various reasons. Arguably, justice is affected by language (Eades,1996).There are high percentages of indigenous imprisoned persons to which some people think it is due to their limited communication skills or their systemic language differences. Undoubtedly, the fact that an accused person is unable to clearly understand what goes on in his or her own trial, is hardly a fair trial but also a violation of the accused persons right to justice. For persons affected by language-based discrimination, personal frustration missed opportunities, the unfair trial is some of the consequences experienced by the victim (Hedley, 2006).Every human being is entitled to a right of fair trial which includes the right to defend oneself against the allegations. One such way is giving testimony in ones favor to which Robyn, was not accorded. Infringement of basic human rights is a direct and relatable consequence of language-based discrimination. This goes to show how negatively such language-based discrimination effects. According to Eades, indigenous persons are unable to seek clarification or unable to fully understand the proceedings against them due to the systemic language differences. This is highly likely to lead to a miscarriage of justice. Essentially, Language discrimination effects are purely negative. The affected party feels ashamed and sometimes feels the need to be pretentious (Tan, n .d).Also, injustice can be a product of discrimination as evidenced by the lack of opportunity to defend oneself by giving evidence and workplace language based discrimination (Hedley, 2006: Lippi-Green, 1994).Owing to the fact that the accused trial took part without her active involvement is highly unjust. Profoundly, Lippi Green and Hedley agree that discrimination has negative consequences on their victims. Mainly, Lippi focuses on workplace discrimination whereas Hedley focuses on legal injustice .However, both agree that discrimination are a violation of human rights and negatively impact on the victims. Conclusion Conclusively, language based discrimination negatively impacts on the victims. However, legal avenues such as legislation and related agencies can provide redress .Language discrimination has led to unjust legal proceedings, workplace injustices, poor academic scores in English among other limited experiences. Also, language impacts on the future careers of indigenous people .However, through legal channels such as legislations, agencies, the negative effects can be addressed. All in all no person deserves to be discriminated on any count. References Eades, D. (1996).Legal Recognition of cultural differences in communication: The case of Robyn Kina.. Science Direct..Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0271530996000110 Hedley, T. (2006, Dec 16).Failure of a justice system that feels all too familiar. The Australian. Retrieved from https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/failure-of-justice-system-that-feels-all-too-familiar/story-e6frg6nf-1111112697062 Lippi-Green, R. (1994).Accent, standard language ideology, and Discriminatory pretext in the courts. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.Org/stable/4168513 Tan, A. (n. d).Mother's tongue.UMSL.Retrieved from https://www.umsl.edu/~alexanderjm/Mother%20Tongue%20by%20Tan.pdf